Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Rural Residence on Forgoing Healthcare after Cancer Because of Cost

Authors :
Ann M. Geiger
Lingyi Lu
L. Douglas Case
Kathryn E. Weaver
Nynikka R. Palmer
Source :
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, vol 22, iss 10
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2013.

Abstract

Background: Routine follow-up care is recommended to promote the well-being of cancer survivors, but financial difficulties may interfere. Rural–urban disparities in forgoing healthcare due to cost have been observed in the general population; however, it is unknown whether this disparity persists among survivors. The purpose of this study was to examine rural–urban disparities in forgoing healthcare after cancer due to cost. Methods: We analyzed data from 7,804 cancer survivors in the 2006 to 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, were used to assess rural–urban disparities in forgoing medical care, prescription medications, and dental care due to cost, stratified by age (younger: 18–64, older: 65+). Results: Compared with urban survivors, younger rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical care (P < 0.001) and prescription medications (P < 0.001) due to cost; older rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical (P < 0.001) and dental care (P = 0.05). Rural–urban disparities did not persist among younger survivors in adjusted analyses; however, older rural survivors remained more likely to forgo medical [OR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11–2.48] and dental care (OR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.08–2.20). Conclusions: Adjustment for health insurance and other sociodemographic characteristics attenuates rural–urban disparities in forgoing healthcare among younger survivors, but not older survivors. Financial factors relating to healthcare use among rural survivors should be a topic of continued investigation. Impact: Addressing out-of-pocket costs may be an important step in reducing rural–urban disparities in healthcare, especially for older survivors. It will be important to monitor how healthcare reform efforts impact disparities observed in this vulnerable population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(10); 1668–76. ©2013 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
15387755 and 10559965
Volume :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6c22fa688e9037f14bb8df4d5eb9ec95
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0421