Back to Search Start Over

Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays

Authors :
Christophe Hézode
Daniel Dhumeaux
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky
Anne Bastie
Jocelyne Rémiré
I. Lonjon
Françoise Darthuy
Source :
Journal of Virological Methods. 85:11-21
Publication Year :
2000
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2000.

Abstract

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in molecular biology-based assays appear to be the most reliable methods for monitoring HBV infection and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three HBV-DNA detection and quantification assays currently used for the management of HBV-infected patients: a solution-hybridization assay based on hybrid-capture (Digene Hybrid-Capture™, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK); a signal-amplification assay based on ‘branched-DNA’ (bDNA) technology (Quantiplex™ HBV DNA, Bayer Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA); and a target-amplification assay based on competitive polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HBV Monitor™, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). The Monitor assay was significantly more sensitive than both the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. This better sensitivity appeared to be clinically relevant. The linear ranges of quantification in the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor methods were 6.5–9 log 10 genome copies/ml, 6.5–9.5 log 10 genome equivalents/ml, and 3–5.5 log 10 genome copies/ml, respectively. However, the HBV-DNA units used in the three assays were not comparable. The specificity of the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor assays was 99.2% (95% confidence interval: 97.7–100.0%), 99.2% (97.7–100.0%), and 97.8% (95.3–100%), respectively. Their within-run coefficients of variation and log 10 SDs were 5.5% (±0.025 log 10 copies/ml), 6.7% (±0.029 log 10 Eq/ml) and 21.0% (±0.093 log 10 copies/ml), respectively. Between-run coefficients of variation ranged from 4.4–39.1%, 5–39.5%, and 17.8–96.1%, respectively. The competitive PCR-based Monitor assay appears to be significantly more sensitive but slightly less specific and reproducible than the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. Given their respective performance, these three assays should be used in complementary fashion in the management of HBV-infected patients.

Details

ISSN :
01660934
Volume :
85
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Virological Methods
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6bda551405c918554194cf99e03a1549
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0934(99)00149-4