Back to Search Start Over

Therapeutic Challenges in Patients with Gynecologic Carcinosarcomas: Analysis of a Multicenter National Cohort Study from the French Prospective TMRG Network

Authors :
Clémence Romeo
Olivia Le Saux
Margaux Jacobs
Florence Joly
Gwenael Ferron
Laure Favier
Jean-David Fumet
Nicolas Isambert
Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
Renaud Sabatier
Ludovic Bastide
Amandine Charreton
Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran
Witold Gertych
Coraline Dubot
Diana Bello Roufai
Guillaume Bataillon
Dominique Berton
Elsa Kalbacher
Patricia Pautier
Christophe Pomel
Caroline Cornou
Isabelle Treilleux
Audrey Lardy-Cleaud
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (UNICANCER/CRCL)
Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer François Baclesse [Caen] (UNICANCER/CRLC)
Normandie Université (NU)-UNICANCER-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)
Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Étude des Cancers de l'Ovaire et du sein [Paris] (GINECO)
Institut Claudius Regaud
Département d'oncologie médicale [Centre Georges-François Leclerc]
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le cancer Georges-François Leclerc [Dijon] (UNICANCER/CRLCC-CGFL)
UNICANCER-UNICANCER
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS)
Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)
Institut Curie - Saint Cloud (ICSC)
Institut Curie [Paris]
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest [Angers/Nantes] (UNICANCER/ICO)
UNICANCER
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon (CHRU Besançon)
Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR)
Centre Jean Perrin [Clermont-Ferrand] (UNICANCER/CJP)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon
Source :
Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 2; Pages: 354, Cancers, Vol 14, Iss 354, p 354 (2022), Cancers, Cancers, 2022, 14 (2), pp.354. ⟨10.3390/cancers14020354⟩
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2022.

Abstract

Simple Summary Gynecologic carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. Using the data from the French National Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network, we conducted a multicentric cohort study to explore several burned questions. The main objective was to assess the outcome of patients with carcinosarcomas recorded in the network and to investigate the efficacy of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies in a real-life setting. Four hundred and twenty-five patients were analyzed including 313 uterine and 112 ovarian carcinosarcomas. Our data suggest positive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in all stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas) and the importance of platinum-based combination for the treatment of relapse. In addition we report median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting. Abstract Background: Gynecological carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases, with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies. Patients and methods: A multicentric cohort study within the French national prospective Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network was conducted. Data from all included carcinosarcomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. Results: 425 cases of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (n = 313 and n = 112, respectively) were collected and analyzed from 12 participating centers. At diagnosis, 140 patients (48%) had a FIGO stage III–IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and 88 patients (83%) had an advanced ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) (FIGO stage ≥ III). Two hundred sixty-seven patients (63%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, most preferably carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen (n = 227, 86%). After a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.3–20.6) and 14.8 months (95% CI 13.1–17.1) for OCS and UCS, respectively. The median overall survival for OCS and UCS was 37.1 months (95% CI 22.2–49.2) and 30.6 months (95% CI 24.1–40.9), respectively. With adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, mPFS was 41.0 months (95% CI 17.0–NR) and 18.9 months (95% CI 14.0–45.6) for UCS stages I–II and stages III–IV, respectively. In the early stage UCS subgroup (i.e., stage IA, n = 86, 30%), mPFS for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) was not reached (95% CI 22.2–NR), while mPFS for untreated patients (n = 62) was 19.9 months (95% IC 13.9–72.9) (HR 0.44 (0.20–0.95) p = 0.03). At the first relapse, median PFS for all patients was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.5–5.3). In the first relapse, mPFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1–8.5) and 2.2 months (95% CI 1.9–2.9) with a combination of chemotherapy or monotherapy, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Interestingly, this vast prospective cohort of gynecological carcinosarcoma patients from the French national Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors network (i) highlights the positive impact of adjuvant CT on survival in all localized stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas), (ii) confirms the importance of platinum-based combination as an option for relapse setting, and (iii) reports median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 2; Pages: 354
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6bc2b25ac4c99a14c1f15bf480b2056f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14020354