Back to Search
Start Over
Would depositors pay to show that they do not withdraw? Theory and experiment
- Source :
- Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Biblos-e Archivo: Repositorio Institucional de la UAM, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- In a Diamond–Dybvig type model of financial intermediation, we allow depositors to announce at a positive cost to subsequent depositors that they keep their funds deposited in the bank. Theoretically, the mere availability of public announcements (and not its use) ensures that no bank run is the unique equilibrium outcome. Multiple equilibria—including bank run—exist without such public announcements. We test the theoretical results in the lab and find a widespread use of announcements, which we interpret as an attempt to coordinate on the no bank run outcome. Withdrawal rates in general are lower in information sets that contain announcements.
- Subjects :
- Public information
050208 finance
05 social sciences
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Financial intermediary
Bank run
Monetary economics
experimental evidence
Outcome (game theory)
Economía
Test (assessment)
Information asymmetry
asymmetric information
0502 economics and business
bank runs
public information
Business
050207 economics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15736938 and 13864157
- Volume :
- 23
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Experimental Economics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6b148c55044b2748cac32eb336c18c5c