Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors :
Flávio Geraldo Resende Freitas
Viviane C Veiga
Marco Antonio Vieira Guedes
John A. Kellum
Thiago Domingos Corrêa
Ary Serpa-Neto
M. Assuncao
Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti
Eraldo de Azevedo Lúcio
Flávia Ribeiro Machado
Israel Silva Maia
BaSICS investigators
Thiago Lisboa
Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte
Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion
Rafael M. Soares
Fernando G. Zampieri
Tamiris A Miranda
Cristina Prata Amendola
Lúcio C Oliveira-Júnior
Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel
Fábio H Lacerda
Rodrigo S Biondi
João M Silva-Junior
Rodrigo M Gurgel
Jorge Luiz da Rocha Paranhos
Lucas P. Damiani
Nilton Brandão da Silva
Denise M. Paisani
Wilson José Lovato
Rodrigo C Figueiredo
Lucas M de Lima
Intensive Care Medicine
Source :
JAMA, JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 326(9), 818-829. American Medical Association
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Importance Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury. Objective To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients. Design, Setting, and Participants Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinical trial conducted at 75 ICUs in Brazil. Patients who were admitted to the ICU with at least 1 risk factor for worse outcomes, who required at least 1 fluid expansion, and who were expected to remain in the ICU for more than 24 hours were randomized between May 29, 2017, and March 2, 2020; follow-up concluded on October 29, 2020. Patients were randomized to 2 different fluid types (a balanced solution vs saline solution reported in this article) and 2 different infusion rates (reported separately). Interventions Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a balanced solution (n = 5522) or 0.9% saline solution (n = 5530) for all intravenous fluids. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 90-day survival. Results Among 11 052 patients who were randomized, 10 520 (95.2%) were available for the analysis (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 17] years; 44.2% were women). There was no significant interaction between the 2 interventions (fluid type and infusion speed;P = .98). Planned surgical admissions represented 48.4% of all patients. Of all the patients, 60.6% had hypotension or vasopressor use and 44.3% required mechanical ventilation at enrollment. Patients in both groups received a median of 1.5 L of fluid during the first day after enrollment. By day 90, 1381 of 5230 patients (26.4%) assigned to a balanced solution died vs 1439 of 5290 patients (27.2%) assigned to saline solution (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.05];P = .47). There were no unexpected treatment-related severe adverse events in either group. Conclusion and Relevance Among critically ill patients requiring fluid challenges, use of a balanced solution compared with 0.9% saline solution did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. The findings do not support the use of this balanced solution. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02875873

Details

ISSN :
15383598 and 00987484
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JAMA
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6ab1a6a05b1ca8e2d095f54d6190e87e