Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e88440 (2014)
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Background Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods. Results Outcome of Efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18–4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04–13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30–5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03–23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08–0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47–6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD = −3.11, 95%CI −4.43 to −1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD = −6.25, 95%CI −7.96 to −4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD = −3.47, 95%CI −5.73 to −1.21). Conclusions It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction.
- Subjects :
- Comparative Effectiveness Research
Non-Clinical Medicine
lcsh:Medicine
law.invention
chemistry.chemical_compound
Randomized controlled trial
law
Edaravone
Medicine
lcsh:Science
Stroke
Acute ischemic stroke
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Multidisciplinary
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Radical Scavengers
Treatment Outcome
Neurology
Meta-analysis
Methacrylates
Drug Therapy, Combination
Kallikreins
Research Article
medicine.medical_specialty
Drugs and Devices
China
Systematic Reviews
Clinical Research Design
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Urology
Placebo
Pharmacotherapy
Fibrinolytic Agents
Humans
Ischemic Stroke
Aged
Health Care Policy
business.industry
Stroke scale
Coagulants
lcsh:R
Bayes Theorem
medicine.disease
Probability Theory
Surgery
chemistry
lcsh:Q
Meta-Analyses
business
Mathematics
Antipyrine
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6a81c6d16843567e18b068f7d4bdbd12