Back to Search Start Over

First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Annery G Garcia-Marcinkiewicz
Pete G Kovatsis
Agnes I Hunyady
Patrick N Olomu
Bingqing Zhang
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy
Adolfo Gonzalez
Siri Kanmanthreddy
Jorge A Gálvez
Amber M Franz
James Peyton
Raymond Park
Edgar E Kiss
David Sommerfield
Heather Griffis
Akira Nishisaki
Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg
Vinay M Nadkarni
Francis X McGowan
John E Fiadjoe
David Ladner
Nicholas Burjek
Narasimhan Jagannathan
John Hadjuk
Saeedah Asaf
Chris Glover
Mary L Stein
Ramesh Kodavatiganti
B B Bruins
Brian Struyk
Luis Sequera-Ramos
Christopher Ward
Elizabeth Laverriere
Harshad Gurnaney
Eric Scheu
Heather Farrell
Paul Stricker
Pilar Castro
Angela Lee
Songyos Valairucha
Judit Szolnoki
Jennifer Zieg
Franklin B Chiao
Brad M Taicher
Jurgen C De Graaff
Nicholas M Dalesio
Robert S Greenberg
Angela R Lucero
Lillian Zamora
Allison Fernandez
Nada Mohamed
Stefano C Sabato
Christopher D Holmes
Somaletha T Bhattacharya
Jonathan Meserve
Paul I Reynolds
Bishr Haydar
Monica Weber
Megan Therrian
Martina Richtsfeld
Mark S Teen
Anesthesiology
Source :
The Lancet, 396(10266), 1905-1913. Elsevier Ltd.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Orotracheal intubation of infants using direct laryngoscopy can be challenging. We aimed to investigate whether video laryngoscopy with a standard blade done by anaesthesia clinicians improves the first-attempt success rate of orotracheal intubation and reduces the risk of complications when compared with direct laryngoscopy. We hypothesised that the first-attempt success rate would be higher with video laryngoscopy than with direct laryngoscopy. Methods: In this multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, we recruited infants without difficult airways abnormalities requiring orotracheal intubation in operating theatres at four quaternary children's hospitals in the USA and one in Australia. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy using random permuted blocks of size 2, 4, and 6, and stratified by site and clinician role. Guardians were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with a successful first attempt at orotracheal intubation. Analysis (modified intention-to-treat [mITT] and per-protocol) used a generalised estimating equation model to account for clustering of patients treated by the same clinician and institution, and adjusted for gestational age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, weight, clinician role, and institution. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03396432. Findings: Between June 4, 2018, and Aug 19, 2019, 564 infants were randomly assigned: 282 (50%) to video laryngoscopy and 282 (50%) to direct laryngoscopy. The mean age of infants was 5·5 months (SD 3·3). 274 infants in the video laryngoscopy group and 278 infants in the direct laryngoscopy group were included in the mITT analysis. In the video laryngoscopy group, 254 (93%) infants were successfully intubated on the first attempt compared with 244 (88%) in the direct laryngoscopy group (adjusted absolute risk difference 5·5% [95% CI 0·7 to 10·3]; p=0·024). Severe complications occurred in four (2%) infants in the video laryngoscopy group compared with 15 (5%) in the direct laryngoscopy group (–3·7% [–6·5 to –0·9]; p=0·0087). Fewer oesophageal intubations occurred in the video laryngoscopy group (n=1 [

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01406736
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet, 396(10266), 1905-1913. Elsevier Ltd.
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6a7bd7da97b18df57a8f762fa6c6e5f5