Treatment of urinary incontinence: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument

This systematic review evaluated the rigor of the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). The searched sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and specific databases of CPG. Reviewers, organized in triplicate and independently, selected the studies and assessed the quality of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, which contains six domains for classification. The classification of the CPGs prioritized the domain 3 (developmental rigor) considering: high (score > 60%), moderate (score 30–60%), or low quality (score