Back to Search Start Over

Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study

Authors :
Emilio Manno
Andrea Tirone
Mario Musella
Vincenzo Bruni
Marcello Lucchese
Giuseppe Iovino
Gastone Veroux
Enrico Facchiano
Marco Raffaelli
Antonio Vitiello
Maurizio De Luca
Nunzio Velotti
Luigi Piazza
Antonio Susa
Rossella D’Alessio
Francesco Greco
Giuseppe Vuolo
Musella, M.
Bruni, V.
Greco, F.
Raffaelli, M.
Lucchese, M.
Susa, A.
De Luca, M.
Vuolo, G.
Manno, E.
Vitiello, A.
Velotti, N.
D'Alessio, R.
Facchiano, E.
Tirone, A.
Iovino, G.
Veroux, G.
Piazza, L.
Source :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 15(8)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure, while laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been for a decade one of the most popular interventions for weight loss. After LSG and LAGB, some patients may require a second surgery due to weight regain or late complications. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a promising bariatric procedure, which provides effective long-term weight loss and has a favorable effect on type 2 diabetes. Objectives To retrospectively analyze data from 10 Italian centers on conversion from LAGB and LSG to OAGB. Setting High-volume centers for bariatric surgery. Methods Prospectively collected data from 10 high-volume centers were retrospectively reviewed. Body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess BMI loss, reasons for redo, remission from co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, and dyslipidemia), and major complications were recorded. Results Three hundred patients were included in the study; 196 patients underwent conversion from LAGB to OAGB and 104 were converted from LSG. BMI was 45.1 ± 7 kg/m2 at the time of first intervention, 41.8 ± 6.3 kg/m2 at redo time, and 30.5 ± 5.5 kg/m2 at last follow-up appointment. Mean percentage of excess BMI loss was 13.2 ± 28.2 at conversion and 73.4 ± 27.5 after OAGB. Remission rates from hypertension, diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, and dyslipidemia were 40%, 62.5%, 58.7% and 52%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 20.8 (range, 6–156) months and overall complications rate was 8.6%. Conclusion Our data show that OAGB is a safe and effective revisional procedure after failed restrictive bariatric surgery.

Details

ISSN :
18787533
Volume :
15
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....69f6a42155af6e39762e36118a029664