Back to Search
Start Over
Accuracy of a reverse dot blot hybridization assay for simultaneous detection of the resistance of four anti-tuberculosis drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from China
- Source :
- Infectious Diseases of Poverty, Infectious Diseases of Poverty, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background Drug resistant tuberculosis poses a great challenge for tuberculosis control worldwide. Timely determination of drug resistance and effective individual treatment are essential for blocking the transmission of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We aimed to establish and evaluate the accuracy of a reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH) assay to simultaneously detect the resistance of four anti-tuberculosis drugs in M. tuberculosis isolated in China. Methods In this study, we applied a RDBH assay to simultaneously detect the resistance of rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), streptomycin (SM) and ethambutol (EMB) in 320 clinical M. tuberculosis isolates and compared the results to that from phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) and sequencing. The RDBH assay was designed to test up to 42 samples at a time. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compute the statistical measures of the RDBH assay using the phenotypic DST or sequencing as the gold standard method, and Kappa identity test was used to determine the consistency between the RDBH assay and the phenotypic DST or sequencing. Results The results showed that the concordances between phenotypic DST and RDBH assay were 95% for RIF, 92.8% for INH, 84.7% for SM, 77.2% for EMB and the concordances between sequencing and RDBH assay were 97.8% for RIF, 98.8% for INH, 99.1% for SM, 93.4% for EMB. Compared to the phenotypic DST results, the sensitivity and specificity of the RDBH assay for resistance detection were 92.4 and 98.5% for RIF, 90.3 and 97.3% for INH, 77.4 and 91.5% for SM, 61.4 and 85.7% for EMB, respectively; compared to sequencing, the sensitivity and specificity of the RDBH assay were 97.7 and 97.9% for RIF, 97.9 and 100.0% for INH, 97.8 and 100.0% for SM, 82.6 and 99.1% for EMB, respectively. The turnaround time of the RDBH assay was 7 h for testing 42 samples. Conclusions Our data suggested that the RDBH assay could serve as a rapid and efficient method for testing the resistance of M. tuberculosis against RIF, INH, SM and EMB, enabling early administration of appropriate treatment regimens to the affected drug resistant tuberculosis patients.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
China
Tuberculosis
Reverse dot blot hybridization
Immunoblotting
030106 microbiology
Antitubercular Agents
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Drug resistance
Sensitivity and Specificity
lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
03 medical and health sciences
parasitic diseases
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Isoniazid
medicine
Humans
lcsh:RC109-216
Rifampicin
Ethambutol
biology
business.industry
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
lcsh:RA1-1270
General Medicine
Gold standard (test)
bacterial infections and mycoses
medicine.disease
biology.organism_classification
Virology
030104 developmental biology
Infectious Diseases
Streptomycin
Rifampin
business
Research Article
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 20499957
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Infectious Diseases of Poverty
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....69d288ac5785ffcaaac4efbafb25eb14
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00652-z