Comparison Between Full-Length 16S rRNA Metabarcoding and Whole Metagenome Sequencing Suggests the Use of Either Is Suitable for Large-Scale Microbiome Studies

Since the number of studies of the microbial communities related to food and food-associated matrices almost completely reliant on next-generation sequencing techniques is rising, evaluations of these high-throughput methods are critical. Currently, the two most used sequencing methods to profile the microbiota of complex samples, including food and food-related matrices, are the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) metabarcoding and the whole metagenome sequencing (WMS), both of which are powerful tools for the monitoring of foodborne pathogens and the investigation of the microbiome. Herein, the microbial profiles of 20 bulk tank milk filters from different dairy farms were investigated using both the full-length 16S (FL-16S) rRNA metabarcoding, a third-generation sequencing method whose application in food and food-related matrices is yet in its infancy, and the WMS, to evaluate the correlation and the reliability of these two methods to explore the microbiome of food-related matrices. Metabarcoding and metagenomic data were generated on a MinION platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and on a Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, respectively. Our findings support the greater resolution of WMS in terms of both increased detection of bacterial taxa and enhanced detection of diversity; in contrast, FL-16S rRNA metabarcoding has proven to be a promising, less expensive, and more practical tool to profile most abundant taxa. The significant correlation of the two technologies both in terms of taxa diversity and richness, together with the similar profiles defined for both highly abundant taxa and core microbiomes, including