Motivators of becoming and staying a neurosurgeon in the Netherlands: a survey and focus group

Objective: The aim of this study was to gain insight in motivators and demotivators of the Dutch neurosurgical residents and neurosurgeons. Methods: A mixed method study was conducted. A survey was sent by the Dutch Neurosurgical Society to all Dutch neurosurgeons and residents in the framework of the yearly national quality conference. The focus groups were held during the Dutch national training days for neurosurgical residents. Baseline statistics were made of all survey data. Focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and open coded in a constant comparative manner. Results: The survey yielded a response rate of 47.3% of neurosurgeons and 72.5% of residents. 42.5% of residents participated in the focus groups. Overall, motivators according to residents and neurosurgeons were divided between autonomous and controlled motivation. For residents, the motivators to become a neurosurgeon were mostly patient-centered. Neurosurgeons had the same general motivators as residents. Around one-third of neurosurgeons considered ending their career as a neurosurgeon. Among residents, 9.5% considered quitting residency. Neurosurgeons and residents indicated that no time for their family life, increased administrative burden and non-patient-related tasks were reasons to consider leaving the profession. Also, less perceived respect from patients and society was a reason to consider ending their career as a neurosurgeon. Conclusion: Neurosurgeons and residents in neurosurgery are mostly motivated by intrinsic motivators. Factors such as administrative burden, less perceived respect from patients and society, and increase in non-patient-related tasks are large demotivators for both neurosurgeons and residents.