Back to Search
Start Over
A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis
- Source :
- Lynch, P M, Morris, J S, Wen, S, Advani, S M, Ross, W, Chang, G J, Rodriguez-Bigas, M, Raju, G S, Ricciardiello, L, Iwama, T, Rossi, B M, Pellise, M, Stoffel, E, Wise, P E, Bertario, L, Saunders, B, Burt, R, Belluzzi, A, Ahnen, D, Matsubara, N, Bülow, S, Jespersen, N, Clark, S K, Erdman, S, Markowitz, A J, Bernstein, I, De Haas, N, Syngal, S & Moeslein, G 2016, ' A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis ', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 115-125.e4 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.029, 125.e4
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background and Aims It is not possible to accurately count adenomas in many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Nevertheless, polyp counts are critical in evaluating each patient's response to interventions. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recognizes the decrease in polyp burden as a sufficient chemoprevention trial treatment endpoint requiring a measure of "clinical benefit." To develop endpoints for future industry-sponsored chemopreventive trials, the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSIGHT) developed an FAP staging and intervention classification scheme for lower-GI tract polyposis. Methods Twenty-four colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy videos were reviewed by 26 clinicians familiar with diagnosis and treatment of FAP. The reviewers independently assigned a stage to a case by using the proposed system and chose a stage-specific intervention for each case. Our endpoint was the degree of concordance among reviewers staging and intervention assessments. Results The staging and intervention ratings of the 26 reviewers were highly concordant (ρ = 0.710; 95% credible interval, 0.651-0.759). Sixty-two percent of reviewers agreed on the FAP stage, and 90% of scores were within ±1 stage of the mode. Sixty percent of reviewers agreed on the intervention, and 86% chose an intervention within ±1 level of the mode. Conclusions The proposed FAP colon polyposis staging system and stage-specific intervention are based on a high degree of agreement on the part of experts in the review of individual cases of polyposis. Therefore, reliable and clinically relevant means for measuring trial outcomes can be developed. Outlier cases showing wide scatter in stage assignment call for individualized attention and may be inappropriate for enrollment in clinical trials for this reason.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Consensus
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Adenomatous polyposis coli
Concordance
Psychological intervention
Video Recording
Colonoscopy
Severity of Illness Index
Article
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Stage (cooking)
Sigmoidoscopy
Colectomy
Neoplasm Staging
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
biology
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Gastroenterologists
Gastroenterology
1103 Clinical Sciences
medicine.disease
Surgery
Clinical trial
Sulfasalazine
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
biology.protein
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Female
business
Colorectal Surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Lynch, P M, Morris, J S, Wen, S, Advani, S M, Ross, W, Chang, G J, Rodriguez-Bigas, M, Raju, G S, Ricciardiello, L, Iwama, T, Rossi, B M, Pellise, M, Stoffel, E, Wise, P E, Bertario, L, Saunders, B, Burt, R, Belluzzi, A, Ahnen, D, Matsubara, N, Bülow, S, Jespersen, N, Clark, S K, Erdman, S, Markowitz, A J, Bernstein, I, De Haas, N, Syngal, S & Moeslein, G 2016, ' A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis ', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 115-125.e4 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.029, 125.e4
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....68df4dd5e5946add0de8e5a9de6165ec
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.029