Back to Search Start Over

Identification of prey captures in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted accelerometers: field validation with animal-borne video cameras

Authors :
Andrew J. Hoskins
Greg Marshall
John P. Y. Arnould
Morgane Viviant
Beth L. Volpov
Kathryn E. Wheatley
Brian C. Battaile
Kyler Abernathy
School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Deakin University [Burwood]
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [Canberra] (CSIRO)
Marine Mammal Research Unit (University of British Columbia)
University of British Columbia (UBC)
Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - UMR 7372 (CEBC)
Université de La Rochelle (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Remote Imaging Department
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de La Rochelle (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2015, 10 ((6)), pp.e0128789. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0128789⟩, PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 6, p e0128789 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

International audience; This study investigated prey captures in free-ranging adult female Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted 3-axis accelerometers and animal-borne video cameras. Acceleration data was used to identify individual attempted prey captures (APC), and video data were used to independently verify APC and prey types. Results demonstrated that head-mounted accelerometers could detect individual APC but were unable to distinguish among prey types (fish, cephalopod, stingray) or between successful captures and unsuccessful capture attempts. Mean detection rate (true positive rate) on individual animals in the testing subset ranged from 67-100%, and mean detection on the testing subset averaged across 4 animals ranged from 82-97%. Mean False positive (FP) rate ranged from 15-67% individually in the testing subset, and 26-59% averaged across 4 animals. Surge and sway had significantly greater detection rates, but also conversely greater FP rates compared to heave. Video data also indicated that some head movements recorded by the accelerometers were unrelated to APC and that a peak in acceleration variance did not always equate to an individual prey item. The results of the present study indicate that head-mounted accelerometers provide a complementary tool for investigating foraging behaviour in pinnipeds, but that detection and FP correction factors need to be applied for reliable field application.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2015, 10 ((6)), pp.e0128789. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0128789⟩, PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 6, p e0128789 (2015)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....68a784feefe1709b2e2c5661ec326a5b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128789⟩