Back to Search Start Over

Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis, a systematic review and meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis for studies comparable for confounders

Authors :
Joseph Rodrigue Foe-Essomba
Sebastien Kenmoe
Serges Tchatchouang
Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo
Donatien Serge Mbaga
Cyprien Kengne-Ndé
Gadji Mahamat
Ginette Irma Kame-Ngasse
Efietngab Atembeh Noura
Chris Andre Mbongue Mikangue
Alfloditte Flore Feudjio
Jean Bosco Taya-Fokou
Sabine Aimee Touangnou-Chamda
Rachel Audrey Nayang-Mundo
Inès Nyebe
Jeannette Nina Magoudjou-Pekam
Jacqueline Félicité Yéngué
Larissa Gertrude Djukouo
Cynthia Paola Demeni Emoh
Hervé Raoul Tazokong
Arnol Bowo-Ngandji
Eric Lontchi-Yimagou
Afi Leslie Kaiyven
Valerie Flore Donkeng Donfack
Richard Njouom
Jean Claude Mbanya
Wilfred Fon Mbacham
Sara Eyangoh
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 12 (2021), PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 12, p e0261246 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, 2021.

Abstract

Introduction Meta-analyses conducted so far on the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the tuberculosis (TB) development risk did not sufficiently take confounders into account in their estimates. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether DM is associated with an increased risk of developing TB with a sensitivity analyses incorporating a wider range of confounders including age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoke exposure, and other comorbidities. Methods Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus were queried from inception until October 2020. Without any restriction to time of study, geographical location, and DM and TB diagnosis approaches, all observational studies that presented data for associations between DM and TB were included. Studies with no abstract or complete text, duplicates, and studies with wrong designs (review, case report, case series, comment on an article, and editorial) or populations were excluded. The odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated by a random-effect model. Results The electronic and manual searches yielded 12,796 articles of which 47 were used in our study (23 case control, 14 cross-sectional and 10 cohort studies) involving 503,760 cases (DM or TB patients) and 3,596,845 controls. The size of the combined effect of TB risk in the presence of DM was OR = 2.3, 95% CI = [2.0–2.7], I2 = 94.2%. This statistically significant association was maintained in cohort (OR = 2.0, CI 95% = [1.5–2.4], I2 = 94.3%), case control (OR = 2.4, CI 95% = [2.0–2.9], I2 = 93.0%) and cross-sectional studies (OR = 2.5, CI 95% = [1.8–3.5], I2 = 95.2%). The association between DM and TB was also maintained in the sensitivity analysis including only studies with similar proportions of confounders between cases and controls. The substantial heterogeneity observed was mainly explained by the differences between geographic regions. Conclusions DM is associated with an increased risk of developing latent and active TB. To further explore the role of DM in the development of TB, more investigations of the biological mechanisms by which DM increases the risk of TB are needed. Review registration PROSPERO, CRD42021216815.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6888a2b6666bfe1d894f319e93ea9ad7