Back to Search Start Over

Risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in Antarctic wildlife

Authors :
Ralph Eric Thijl Vanstreels
Meagan Dewar
Gary Miller
Michelle L. Power
Rachel Gray
Virginia Morandini
Julia Inés Diaz
Arvind Vansani
Wray Grimaldi
Thierry Boulinier
Daniel González-Acuña
Amandine Gamble
Andrés Barbosa
Clive R. McMahon
Michelle Wille
Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España)
European Commission
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
National Science Foundation (US)
National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (Australia)
University of Tasmania
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Argentina)
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France)
Instituto Antártico Chileno
Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales)
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN)
School of Life Sciences [Tempe, USA]
Arizona State University [Tempe] (ASU)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])
School of Health and Life Sciences [Churchill, VIC, Australia]
Federation University Australia
Universidad de Concepción
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales [Madrid] (MNCN)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)
Oregon State University (OSU)
Universidad Nacional de la Plata [Argentine] (UNLP)
Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)
Federation University [Churchill, Australia]
Universidad de Concepción [Chile]
The University of Sydney
The University of Western Australia (UWA)
Macquarie University [Sydney]
University of California [Los Angeles] (UCLA)
University of California
Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Universidad de Concepción - University of Concepcion [Chile]
University of California (UC)
Source :
CONICET Digital (CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, instacron:CONICET, Science of the Total Environment, Science of the Total Environment, Elsevier, 2020, pp.143352. ⟨10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143352⟩, Science of the Total Environment, Elsevier, 2021, 755, pp.143352. ⟨10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143352⟩, Science of The Total Environment, The Science of the Total Environment, Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 755, pp.143352. ⟨10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143352⟩, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This pathogen has spread rapidly across the world, causing high numbers of deaths and significant social and economic impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus with a suggested zoonotic origin with the potential for cross-species transmission among animals. Antarctica can be considered the only continent free of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, concerns have been expressed regarding the potential human introduction of this virus to the continent through the activities of research or tourism to minimise the effects on human health, and the potential for virus transmission to Antarctic wildlife. We assess the reverse-zoonotic transmission risk to Antarctic wildlife by considering the available information on host susceptibility, dynamics of the infection in humans, and contact interactions between humans and Antarctic wildlife. The environmental conditions in Antarctica seem to be favourable for the virus stability. Indoor spaces such as those at research stations, research vessels or tourist cruise ships could allow for more transmission among humans and depending on their movements between different locations the virus could be spread across the continent. Among Antarctic wildlife previous in silico analyses suggested that cetaceans are at greater risk of infection whereas seals and birds appear to be at a low infection risk. However, caution needed until further research is carried out and consequently, the precautionary principle should be applied. Field researchers handling animals are identified as the human group posing the highest risk of transmission to animals while tourists and other personnel pose a significant risk only when in close proximity (< 5 m) to Antarctic fauna. We highlight measures to reduce the risk as well as identify of knowledge gaps related to this issue.<br />Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image<br />Highlights • Conditions in Antarctica could be favourable for SARS-CoV-2 stability. • In silico analyses revealed that Cetaceans have a higher susceptibility to the virus. • Seals and birds seem to have a lower risk of infection. • Wildlife researchers have the highest risk of transmission to Antarctic fauna. • Tourists can be potential vectors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission to Antarctic fauna.

Details

ISSN :
00489697 and 18791026
Volume :
755
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Science of The Total Environment
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6887187d28b0c75b0a46de5616ca82e8