Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a worldwide EQA scheme for complex clonality analysis of clinical lymphoproliferative cases demonstrates a learning effect

Authors :
Elke Boone
Elisabeth Dequeker
Véronique Tack
Markus Möbs
Monika Brüggemann
María Eugenia Sarasquete
Patricia J. T. A. Groenen
Paula Gameiro
Elizabeth Hodges
Ian Carter
Hongxiang Liu
Paul Evans
Cleo Keppens
Dido Lenze
Elisabeth Moreau
Keppens, Cleo [0000-0002-4498-8386]
Gameiro, Paula [0000-0002-3761-7050]
Tack, Véronique [0000-0001-8464-9541]
Evans, Paul [0000-0002-7915-0946]
Sarasquete, Maria Eugenia [0000-0001-7335-3657]
Möbs, Markus [0000-0002-1502-3032]
Groenen, Patricia JTA [0000-0003-4314-228X]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
Virchows Archiv, 479, 2, pp. 365-376, Virchows Archiv, Virchows Archiv, 479, 365-376
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Clonality analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) or T-cell receptor (TR) gene rearrangements is routine practice to assist diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) aids laboratories in identifying systematic shortcomings. The aim of this study was to evaluate laboratories’ improvement in IG/TR analysis and interpretation during five EQA rounds between 2014 and 2018. Each year, participants received a total of five cases for IG and five cases for TR testing. Paper-based cases were included for analysis of the final molecular conclusion that should be interpreted based on the integration of the individual PCR results. Wet cases were distributed for analysis of their routine protocol as well as evaluation of the final molecular conclusion. In total, 94.9% (506/533) of wet tests and 97.9% (829/847) of paper tests were correctly analyzed for IG, and 96.8% (507/524) wet tests and 93.2% (765/821) paper tests were correctly analyzed for TR. Analysis scores significantly improved when laboratories participated to more EQA rounds (p=0.001). Overall performance was significantly lower (p=0.008) for non-EuroClonality laboratories (95% for IG and 93% for TR) compared to EuroClonality laboratories (99% for IG and 97% for TR). The difference was not related to the EQA scheme year, anatomic origin of the sample, or final clinical diagnosis. This evaluation showed that repeated EQA participation helps to reduce performance differences between laboratories (EuroClonality versus non-EuroClonality) and between sample types (paper versus wet). The difficulties in interpreting oligoclonal cases highlighted the need for continued education by meetings and EQA schemes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03046-0.

Details

ISSN :
09456317
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Virchows Archiv, 479, 2, pp. 365-376, Virchows Archiv, Virchows Archiv, 479, 365-376
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6881dd598322bd460645b843434ced43