Back to Search Start Over

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and interaction energy and DFT studies of 2-chloroethyl 2-oxo-1-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-1,2-dihydroquinoline-4-carboxylate

Authors :
Joel T. Mague
Youssef Kandri Rodi
Tuncer Hökelek
Fouad Ouazzani Chahdi
Yassir Filali Baba
Sonia Hayani
Nada Kheira Sebbar
Source :
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications, Vol 75, Iss 10, Pp 1411-1417 (2019), Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
International Union of Crystallography, 2019.

Abstract

The title compound consists of a 1,2-di­hydro­quinoline-4-carboxyl­ate unit with 2-chloro­ethyl and propynyl substituents, where the quinoline moiety is almost planar and the propynyl substituent is nearly perpendicular to its mean plane. In the crystal, the mol­ecules form zigzag stacks along the a-axis direction through slightly offset π-stacking inter­actions between inversion-related quinoline moieties, which are tied together by inter­molecular C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx (Prpnyl = propynyl, Carbx = carboxyl­ate and Chlethy = chloro­eth­yl) hydrogen bonds.<br />The title compound, C15H12ClNO3, consists of a 1,2-di­hydro­quinoline-4-carb­oxyl­ate unit with 2-chloro­ethyl and propynyl substituents, where the quinoline moiety is almost planar and the propynyl substituent is nearly perpendicular to its mean plane. In the crystal, the mol­ecules form zigzag stacks along the a-axis direction through slightly offset π-stacking inter­actions between inversion-related quinoline moieties which are tied together by inter­molecular C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx (Prpnyl = propynyl, Carbx = carboxyl­ate and Chlethy = chloro­eth­yl) hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (29.9%), H⋯O/O⋯H (21.4%), H⋯C/C⋯ H (19.4%), H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (16.3%) and C⋯C (8.6%) inter­actions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals inter­actions are the dominant inter­actions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal, the C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx hydrogen bond energies are 67.1 and 61.7 kJ mol−1, respectively. Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/ 6–311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined mol­ecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO–LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20569890
Volume :
75
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6831ecbe045ad4ea3ac5eb52ef24f87e