Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical value of a screening tool for tumor predisposition syndromes in childhood cancer patients (TuPS)
- Source :
- Familial Cancer, 20, 263-271. SPRINGER, Familial Cancer, Familial Cancer, 20(4), 263-271. Springer Netherlands, Postema, F A M, Hopman, S M J, de Borgie, C A J M, Aalfs, C M, Anninga, J K, Berger, L P V, Bleeker, F E, Dommering, C J, van Eijkelenburg, N K A, Hammond, P, van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M M, Hol, J A, Kors, W A, Letteboer, T G W, Loeffen, J L C M, Meijer, L, Olderode-Berends, M J W, Wagner, A, Hennekam, R C & Merks, J H M 2021, ' Clinical value of a screening tool for tumor predisposition syndromes in childhood cancer patients (TuPS) : a prospective, observational, multi-center study ', Familial Cancer, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 263-271 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-021-00237-1
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Recognizing a tumor predisposition syndrome (TPS) in a child with cancer is of clinical relevance. Earlier we developed a screening tool to increase diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficiency of identifying TPSs in children with cancer. Here we report on the value of this tool in clinical practice. TuPS is a prospective, observational, multi-center study including children newly diagnosed with cancer from 2016 to 2019 in the Netherlands. Children in whom a TPS had been diagnosed before the cancer diagnosis were excluded. The screening tool consists of a checklist, 2D and 3D photographic series and digital assessment of these by a clinical geneticist. If a TPS was suspected, the patient was assessed positive and referred for routine genetic consultation. Primary aim was to assess the clinical value of this new screening tool. Of the 363 included patients, 57% (208/363) were assessed positive. In 15% of patients (32/208), the 2D photographic series with (n = 12) or without (n = 20) 3D photographs were decisive in the positive assessment. In 2% (4/208) of positive assessed patients, a TPS was diagnosed, and in an additional 2% (4/208) a germline variant of uncertain significance was found. Thirty-five negatively assessed patients were evaluated through routine genetic consultation as controls, in none a TPS was detected. Using the screening tool, 57% of the patients were assessed as suspected for having a TPS. No false negative results were identified in the negative control group in the clinical care setting. The observed prevalence of TPS was lower than expected, due to selection bias in the cohort. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10689-021-00237-1.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
media_common.quotation_subject
Genetic predisposition to disease
Pediatrics
Imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Neoplasms
Internal medicine
Genetic screening
Epidemiology
Genetics
medicine
Humans
Mass Screening
Clinical significance
Prospective Studies
Child
Early Detection of Cancer
Genetics (clinical)
media_common
Selection bias
business.industry
Cancer
Syndrome
medicine.disease
Checklist
030104 developmental biology
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Cohort
Clinical value
Original Article
Observational study
Three-dimensional
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13899600
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Familial Cancer
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....67cce1624134f5a9b26b091ecb172ecd
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-021-00237-1