Back to Search Start Over

EULAR recommendations for the management of Behcet disease

Authors :
Petros P. Sfikakis
Sebahattin Yurdakul
Ahmet Gül
Aksel Siva
Miles Stanford
I. Olivieri
N. Stübiger
A. M Chamberlain
Alan J. Silman
H. Yazici
Carlo Salvarani
Bahram Bodaghi
Gulen Hatemi
Dongsik Bang
Ina Kötter
M. H Houman
Source :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 67:1656-1662
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
BMJ, 2008.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop evidence-based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of Behcet disease (BD) supplemented where necessary by expert opinion. Methods: The multidisciplinary expert committee, a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for Clinical Affairs (ESCCA), consisted of nine rheumatologists (one who was also a clinical epidemiologist and one also a Rehabilitation Medicine doctor), three ophthalmologists, one internist, one dermatologist and one neurologist, representing six European countries plus Tunisia and Korea. A patient representative was also present. Problem areas and related keywords for systematic literature research were identified. Systematic literature research was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library databases from 1966 through to December 2006. A total of 40 initial statements were generated based on the systematic literature research. These yielded the final recommendations devel- oped from two blind Delphi rounds of voting. Results: Nine recommendations were developed for the management of different aspects of BD. The strength of each recommendation was determined by the level of evidence and the experts' opinions. The level of agreement for each recommendation was determined using a visual analogue scale for the whole committee and for each individual aspect by the subgroups, who consider themselves experts in that field of BD. There was excellent concordance between the level of agreement of the whole group and the ''experts in the field''. Conclusion: Recommendations related to the eye, skin- mucosa disease and arthritis are mainly evidence based, but recommendations on vascular disease, neurological and gastrointestinal involvement are based largely on expert opinion and uncontrolled evidence from open trials and observational studies. The need for further properly designed controlled clinical trials is apparent.

Details

ISSN :
00034967
Volume :
67
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....675ab22215087c671f8e41908285823a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.080432