Back to Search Start Over

Structural features shared by ICUs belonging to research networks an international survey. 'Critical care research network survey'

Authors :
Gilles Hejblum
Yên-Lan Nguyen
Bertrand Guidet
Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (iPLESP)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (CRC (UMR_S_1138 / U1138))
École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université de Paris (UP)
Service de réanimation médicale polyvalente [CHU Cochin]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Service de Réanimation Médicale [CHU Saint-Antoine]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
Source :
Journal of Critical Care, Journal of Critical Care, WB Saunders, 2019, 54, pp.99-104. ⟨10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.018⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Purpose Major acute care research is conducted within critical care research networks (CCRN). Our aims were to describe CCRN and participating ICUs. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among all CCRNs belonging to the International Forum of Acute Care Trialists. A network questionnaire was sent to CCRN directors and an ICU e-questionnaire was sent to participating ICUS. Results Survey was answered by 366 ICUs from 17 CCRNs (median response rate 21% [12–38]). CCRNs have different organizations (ownership, memberships, funding). The number of studies conducted, patients included and publications varied a lot across CCRNs. The collaboration with other research networks or health authorities was very frequent (n = 13, 76%). Most ICUs (n = 315; 86%) are located in large teaching hospitals in high income countries with a mean volume of 968 (842–1102 (95% CI)) annual admissions. The recognition at the academic level (n = 133; 70%), the collaboration with experts (n = 284; 85%), and improving practices (n = 286; 86%) are incentives reported to belong to a CCRN. Conclusions Despite different organizations, CCRN share similar ventures including the value of improving quality of critical care delivery. Participating ICUs share several structural and managerial patterns. These observations enlighten the importance of CCRN to enhance quality of critical care delivery.

Details

ISSN :
08839441
Volume :
54
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Critical Care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....674beba4c6800b696fcad9bceca43924