Back to Search Start Over

Do rebreathing manoeuvres for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output during maximum exercise test alter the main cardiopulmonary parameters?

Authors :
Elisabetta Salvioni
Marco Morosin
Gianfranco Sinagra
Pasquale Perrone Filardi
Sara Rovai
Piergiuseppe Agostoni
Laura Fusini
Fabiana De Martino
Emanuele Spadafora
Beatrice Pezzuto
Carlo Vignati
Vignati, C.
Morosin, M.
Fusini, L.
Pezzuto, B.
Spadafora, E.
De Martino, F.
Salvioni, E.
Rovai, S.
Filardi, P. P.
Sinagra, G.
Agostoni, P.
Source :
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 26:1616-1622
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.

Abstract

Background Inert gas rebreathing has been recently described as an emergent reliable non-invasive method for cardiac output determination during exercise, allowing a relevant improvement of cardiopulmonary exercise test clinical relevance. For cardiac output measurements by inert gas rebreathing, specific respiratory manoeuvres are needed which might affect pivotal cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters, such as exercise tolerance, oxygen uptake and ventilation vs carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) relationship slope. Method We retrospectively analysed cardiopulmonary exercise testing of 181 heart failure patients who underwent both cardiopulmonary exercise testing and cardiopulmonary exercise test+cardiac output within two months (average 16 ± 15 days). All patients were in stable clinical conditions (New York Heart Association I–III) and on optimal medical therapy. Results The majority of patients were in New York Heart Association Class I and II (78.8%), with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 31 ± 10%. No difference was found between the two tests in oxygen uptake at peak exercise (1101 (interquartile range 870–1418) ml/min at cardiopulmonary exercise test vs 1103 (844–1389) at cardiopulmonary exercise test-cardiac output) and at anaerobic threshold. However, anaerobic threshold and peak heart rate, peak workload (75 (58–101) watts and 64 (42–90), p 2 slope was higher at cardiopulmonary exercise test+cardiac output (30 (27–35) vs 33 (28–37), p Conclusion The similar anaerobic threshold and peak oxygen uptake in the two tests with a lower peak workload and higher VE/VCO2 slope at cardiopulmonary exercise test+cardiac output suggest a higher respiratory work and consequent demand for respiratory muscle blood flow secondary to the ventilatory manoeuvres. Accordingly, VE/VCO2 slope and peak workload must be evaluated with caution during cardiopulmonary exercise test+cardiac output.

Details

ISSN :
20474881 and 20474873
Volume :
26
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6705737b197c775dc0c36452b1546e68
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319845967