Back to Search Start Over

Two Contrasting Failure Modes of Enteric Coated Beads

Authors :
Michelle L. Lytle
Craig A. J. Kemp
Zhicheng Xiao
Robert J. Behme
Jeremy Hinds
Xia Dong
Galen H. Shi
Source :
AAPS PharmSciTech. 19:1827-1836
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms and kinetics of coating failure for enteric coated beads exposed to high-humidity conditions at different storage temperatures. Enteric coated beads were placed on high-humidity conditions (75 to 98% relative humidity (RH)) in the temperature range of 5 to 40°C. These stability samples of beads were tested for acid dissolution and water activity and also analyzed with SEM, X-ray CT, and DMA. Exposure of enteric coated beads to high humidity led to increased gastric release of drug which eventually failed the dissolution specification. SEM showed visible cracks on the surface of beads exposed to 5°C/high humidity and fusion of enteric beads into agglomerates at 40°C/high humidity. In a non-destructive time elapse study, X-ray CT demonstrated swelling of microcrystalline cellulose cores, crack initiation, and propagation through the API layer within days under 5°C/98% RH storage conditions and ultimately fracture through the enteric coating. DMA data showed a marked reduction in Tg of the enteric coating materials after exposure to humidity. At 5°C/high humidity, the hygroscopic microcrystalline cellulose core absorbed moisture leading to core swelling and consequent fracture through the brittle API and enteric layers. At 40°C (high humidity) which is above the Tg of the enteric polymer, enteric coated beads coalesced into agglomerates due to melt flow of the enteric coating. We believe it is the first report on two distinct failure models of enteric coated dosage forms.

Details

ISSN :
15309932
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
AAPS PharmSciTech
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....670253abb4525d2ee25acfa48ad21309
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1000-9