Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of clinical pharmacist management of type 2 diabetes versus usual care in a federally qualified health center

Authors :
Sarah J. Billups
Joseph J. Saseen
Rhianna M. Fink
Emanuela V. Mooney
Source :
Pharmacy Practice, Pharmacy Practice (Granada) v.17 n.4 2019, SciELO España. Revistas Científicas Españolas de Ciencias de la Salud, instname, Pharmacy Practice (Granada), Volume: 17, Issue: 4, Article number: 1618, Published: 20 APR 2020, Pharmacy Practice, Vol 17, Iss 4, p 1618 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
JCFCorp SG PTE LTD, 2019.

Abstract

Background: Clinical pharmacists have demonstrated their ability to improve patient outcomes over usual care for patients with type 2 diabetes and glycemic levels above goal, though reasons for this are not well defined. Numerous medications exist for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes and different patterns of medication use by clinical pharmacists may explain these benefits. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare pharmacotherapy approaches to managing patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes receiving basal insulin by a clinical pharmacist versus usual care by a physician or advanced practice provider in a federally qualified health center. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients 18 to 85 years old with type 2 diabetes, A1C ≥9%, receiving basal insulin was conducted. Patients were grouped into two cohorts (1) those who received clinical pharmacist care and (2) those who received usual care from a physician or advanced practice provider. The primary outcome evaluated the proportion of patients treated with the addition of a non-basal insulin medication. Type of medication changes or additions as well as change in A1C and change in weight were also analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated at six months post-index A1C. Results: A total of 202 patients were identified (n=129 in the usual care group and n=73 in the clinical pharmacist group). A non-basal insulin medication was added in 29% of patients receiving usual care versus 41% of patients receiving clinical pharmacist care (adjusted p=0.040). Usual care providers more frequently added metformin, sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones, while clinical pharmacists more frequently added prandial insulin, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors. A1C decreased 1.6% in the clinical pharmacist group versus 0.9% in the usual care group (adjusted p=0.055). No significant change in weight was observed between the clinical pharmacist and usual care group (0.2 kg versus -1.0 kg, respectively; adjusted p=0.175). Conclusions: Pharmacotherapy approaches to managing patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes varied between clinical pharmacists and other clinician providers. For patients already on basal insulin, clinical pharmacists were more likely to intensify therapy with the addition of non-basal insulin, including more frequent initiation of prandial insulin and by adding newer antihyperglycemic agents.

Details

ISSN :
18863655 and 1885642X
Volume :
17
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pharmacy Practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6647211243faf7364b2f918551a6423e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2019.4.1618