Cite
Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics versus hydroxyapatite: Comparison of angiogenic potential and biological responsiveness
MLA
Federica Chiellini, et al. “Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics versus Hydroxyapatite: Comparison of Angiogenic Potential and Biological Responsiveness.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part AREFERENCES, vol. 107, no. 12, Mar. 2019. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....65d007c594c882f5cca0ab02788f0ffe&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Federica Chiellini, Devis Bellucci, Valeria Cannillo, Preethi Balasubramanian, Simona Braccini, & Aldo R. Boccaccini. (2019). Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics versus hydroxyapatite: Comparison of angiogenic potential and biological responsiveness. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part AREFERENCES, 107(12).
Chicago
Federica Chiellini, Devis Bellucci, Valeria Cannillo, Preethi Balasubramanian, Simona Braccini, and Aldo R. Boccaccini. 2019. “Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics versus Hydroxyapatite: Comparison of Angiogenic Potential and Biological Responsiveness.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part AREFERENCES 107 (12). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....65d007c594c882f5cca0ab02788f0ffe&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.