Back to Search Start Over

Inter-laboratory comparison of 2 ELISA kits used for foot-and-mouth disease virus nonstructural protein serology

Authors :
Santina Grazioli
Anna B. Ludi
Lynne Hendry
Donald P. King
Antonello Di Nardo
Anthony Relmy
Emiliana Brocchi
Tim Pollard
Clare Browning
P.L. Eblé
Aurore Romey
Lissie Henry
Institute for Animal Health, the Pirbright Institute
Animal and Plant Health Agency [Addlestone, UK] (APHA)
Virologie UMR1161 (VIRO)
École nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort (ENVA)-Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Wageningen BioVeterinary Research
Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR)
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER)
DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food Rural Affairs) SE1129SV3022UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BBS/E/I/00007035BBS/E/I/00007036
Source :
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 32(6), 933-937, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 32 (2020) 6, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 2020, 32 (6), pp.933-937. ⟨10.1177/1040638720962070⟩, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation : Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

International audience; Serologic assays used to detect antibodies to nonstructural proteins (NSPs) of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) are used for disease surveillance in endemic countries, and are essential to providing evidence for freedom of the disease with or without vaccination and to recover the free status of a country after an outbreak. In a 5-site inter-laboratory study, we compared the performance of 2 commercial NSP ELISA kits (ID Screen FMD NSP ELISA single day [short] and overnight protocols, ID.Vet; PrioCHECK FMDV NS antibody ELISA, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The overall concordance between the PrioCHECK and ID Screen test was 93.8% (95% CI: 92.0–95.2%) and 94.8% (95% CI: 93.1–96.1%) for the overnight and short ID Screen incubation protocols, respectively. Our results indicate that the assays (including the 2 different formats of the ID Screen test) can be used interchangeably in post-outbreak serosurveillance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10406387
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 32(6), 933-937, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 32 (2020) 6, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 2020, 32 (6), pp.933-937. ⟨10.1177/1040638720962070⟩, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation : Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....65cb115cff8b99a8ba434057a5b7f28f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638720962070⟩