Back to Search Start Over

A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach

Authors :
Per Olav Vandvik
Holger J. Schünemann
Elie A. Akl
Gordon H. Guyatt
David Rind
Reem A. Mustafa
Nancy Santesso
Thomas Agoritsas
Ignacio Neumann
Pablo Alonso-Coello
Paul E. Alexander
Source :
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 72 (2016) pp. 45-55
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2016.

Abstract

An increasing number of organizations worldwide are using new and improved standards for developing trustworthy clinical guidelines. One of such approaches, developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group, offers systematic and transparent guidance in moving from evidence to recommendations. The GRADE strategy concentrates on four factors: the balance between benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, values and preferences, and resource considerations. However, it also considers issues around feasibility, equity, and acceptability of recommendations. GRADE distinguishes two types of recommendations: strong and weak. Strong recommendations reflect a clear preference for one alternative and should apply to all or almost all patients, obviating the need for a careful review of the evidence with each patient. Weak recommendations are appropriate when there is a close balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, uncertainty regarding the effects of the alternatives, uncertainty or variability in patients' values and preferences, or questionable cost-effectiveness. Weak recommendations usually require accessing the underlying evidence and a shared decision-making approach. Clinicians using GRADE recommendations should understand the meaning of the strength of the recommendation, be able to critically appraise the recommendation, and apply trustworthy recommendations according to their strength. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Details

ISSN :
08954356
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 72 (2016) pp. 45-55
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6593c5b4d7693f83ba7ee2a1d5e06d47