Back to Search
Start Over
A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach
- Source :
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 72 (2016) pp. 45-55
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2016.
-
Abstract
- An increasing number of organizations worldwide are using new and improved standards for developing trustworthy clinical guidelines. One of such approaches, developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group, offers systematic and transparent guidance in moving from evidence to recommendations. The GRADE strategy concentrates on four factors: the balance between benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, values and preferences, and resource considerations. However, it also considers issues around feasibility, equity, and acceptability of recommendations. GRADE distinguishes two types of recommendations: strong and weak. Strong recommendations reflect a clear preference for one alternative and should apply to all or almost all patients, obviating the need for a careful review of the evidence with each patient. Weak recommendations are appropriate when there is a close balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, uncertainty regarding the effects of the alternatives, uncertainty or variability in patients' values and preferences, or questionable cost-effectiveness. Weak recommendations usually require accessing the underlying evidence and a shared decision-making approach. Clinicians using GRADE recommendations should understand the meaning of the strength of the recommendation, be able to critically appraise the recommendation, and apply trustworthy recommendations according to their strength. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Subjects :
- Male
Medical education
Evidence-based practice
Epidemiology
media_common.quotation_subject
Health Personnel
Decision Making
Recommendations
03 medical and health sciences
Health personnel
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine
Humans
In patient
030212 general & internal medicine
Grading (education)
media_common
Quality of Health Care
Evidence-Based Medicine
Health professionals
Education, Medical
business.industry
Management science
Education, Medical/methods/standards
Evidence-Based Medicine/standards
Health Personnel/education
Evidence-based medicine
Certainty
3. Good health
Trustworthiness
GRADE
Risk analysis (engineering)
Practice Guidelines as Topic
ddc:618.97
Female
Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
business
Clinical practice guidelines
Decision making
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 08954356
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 72 (2016) pp. 45-55
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6593c5b4d7693f83ba7ee2a1d5e06d47