Comparison of infection rate with tunneled vs standard external ventricular drainage: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Objectives A prospective, blinded, randomized trial was performed to evaluate the incidence rates of external ventricular drainage (EVD)-related infection (ERI) after tunneled EVD (T-EVD) and standard EVD (S-EVD). Patients and methods From February 2018 to February 2019, all adult patients admitted to the Union Hospital Neurosurgery Center for EVD placement were eligible for inclusion. After the application of strict exclusion criteria, all enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in Group A received S-EVD, and the remaining patients in Group B received T-EVD. A linear incision was made for T-EVD. The distal end of the catheter was inserted approximately 5 cm until cerebrospinal fluid was readily obtained, and then the catheter was tunneled approximately 4–5 cm from the insertion point. Finally, an external CSF drainage system was connected to the catheter. For the S-EVD patients, we secured the catheter at the original incision site after insertion, and an external CSF drainage system was also connected to the catheter. The rates of ERI were compared between the two patient groups. The odds ratios and χ² test were used to analyze the results. Results One hundred twenty patients were randomly divided into two groups and underwent EVD placement. Among them, 60 patients in Group A received S-EVD, and 60 patients in Group B received T-EVD. Finally, 51 patients in Group A and 50 patients in Group B met all of the study inclusion/exclusion criteria and were thus eligible for inclusion in the evaluation of ERI rates. All clinical features of the two groups were similar. A total of 12 patients’ (11.9%) CSF cultures were positive for infection. Ten (19.6%) patients who underwent S-EVD had CSF-positive cultures, while only 2 (4.0%) patients who underwent T-EVD had CSF-positive cultures (P = 0.034). Additionally, 8 patients in Group A and 1 patient in Group B were complicated with CSF leakage (P = 0.039). Conclusions Compared to S-EVD, T-EVD, when performed according to a previously established perioperative management protocol, resulted in lower infection and CSF leakage rates. We recommend that T-EVD should be preferentially performed when surgeons determine whether a catheter can be removed within 10 days, and the catheter used for EVD should be removed as soon as permitted by the clinical circumstances.