Back to Search
Start Over
The future, and what might have been
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Springer Netherlands, 2018.
-
Abstract
- We show that five important elements of the ‘nomological package’—laws, counterfactuals, chances, dispositions, and counterfactuals—needn’t be a problem for the Growing-Block view. We begin with the framework given in Briggs and Forbes (in The real truth about the unreal future. Oxford studies in metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012), and, taking laws as primitive, we show that the Growing-Block view has the resources to provide an account of possibility, and a natural semantics for non-backtracking causal counterfactuals. We show how objective chances might ground a more fine-grained concept of feasibility, and furnished a places in the structure where causation and dispositions might fit. The Growing-Block view, thus understood, provides the resources to explain the close link between modality and tense, so that it predicts modal change as time passes. This account lets us capture not only what the future might hold for us, and also what might have been.
- Subjects :
- Structure (mathematical logic)
Philosophy of mind
Counterfactual conditional
05 social sciences
Metaphysics
06 humanities and the arts
0603 philosophy, ethics and religion
050105 experimental psychology
BD
Epistemology
Philosophy of language
Philosophy
Modal
060302 philosophy
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Causation
Psychology
Modality (semiotics)
B1
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00318116
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6304149af11ff9719ab671089568c9ea