Back to Search Start Over

Interventions and strategies involving primary healthcare professionals to manage emergency department overcrowding: a scoping review

Authors :
Rasheda Rabbani
Jeanette Edwards
Thomas Beaudry
Nameer Al-Yousif
Scott W. Kirkland
Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Maya M. Jeyaraman
Simon Berthelot
Rachel N Alder
Brian H. Rowe
Andrea C. Tricco
Yahya Al-Yousif
Jean Mireault
William Sevcik
Gayle Halas
Alecs Chochinov
Ryan Zarychanski
Nicole Askin
Melissa Hartwell
Tamara Buchel
Carolyn Shimmin
Roger Suss
Malcolm Doupe
Leslie Copstein
Patrick Tardif
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 5 (2021), BMJ Open
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

ObjectivesTo conduct a scoping review to identify and summarise the existing literature on interventions involving primary healthcare professionals to manage emergency department (ED) overcrowding.DesignA scoping review.Data sourcesA comprehensive database search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley) and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases was conducted (inception until January 2020) using peer-reviewed search strategies, complemented by a search of grey literature sources.Eligibility criteriaInterventions and strategies involving primary healthcare professionals (PHCPs: general practitioners (GPs), nurse practitioners (NPs) or nurses with expanded role) to manage ED overcrowding.MethodsWe engaged and collaborated, with 13 patient partners during the design and conduct stages of this review. We conducted this review using the JBI guidelines. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. We conducted descriptive analysis of the included studies (frequencies and percentages).ResultsFrom 23 947 records identified, we included 268 studies published between 1981 and 2020. The majority (58%) of studies were conducted in North America and were predominantly cohort studies (42%). The reported interventions were either ‘within ED’ (48%) interventions (eg, PHCP-led ED triage or fast track) or ‘outside ED’ interventions (52%) (eg, after-hours GP clinic and GP cooperatives). PHCPs involved in the interventions were: GP (32%), NP (26%), nurses with expanded role (16%) and combinations of the PHCPs (42%). The ‘within ED’ and ‘outside ED’ interventions reported outcomes on patient flow and ED utilisation, respectively.ConclusionsWe identified many interventions involving PHCPs that predominantly reported a positive impact on ED utilisation/patient flow metrics. Future research needs to focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of specific interventions involving PHCPs to critically appraise and summarise evidence on this topic.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
11
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....62f965d8bc8aa8ff040ca95cc6e9367d