Back to Search Start Over

The combination of sugammadex and neostigmine can reduce the dosage of sugammadex during recovery from the moderate neuromuscular blockade

Authors :
Wonjin Lee
Jiyong Lee
Kun Moo Lee
Jeong Han Lee
Myoung Hun Kim
Dong-ki Hur
Seunghee Ki
Young Jae Kim
Se Hun Lim
Soon Ho Cheong
Kwangrae Cho
Source :
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol 68, Iss 6, Pp 547-555 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015.

Abstract

Background: Sugammadex is a novel neuromuscular reversal agent, but its associated hypersensitivity reaction and high cost have been obstacles to its widespread use. In the interest of reducing the necessary dosage of sugammadex, the rever-sal time of the combined use of sugammadex and neostigmine from moderate neuromuscular blockade were investigated. Methods: The patients enrolled ranged in age from 18 to 65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2. The subjects were randomly assigned into one of the four groups (Group S2, S1, SN, and N; n = 30 per group). The reversal agents of each groups were as follows: S2 - sugammadex 2 mg/kg, S1 - sugammadex 1 mg/kg, SN - sugammadex 1 mg/kg + neostigmine 50 μg/kg + glycopyrrolate 10 μg/kg, N - neostigmine 50 μg/kg + glycopyrrolate 10 μg/kg. The time to recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio was checked in each group. Results: The time to 90% recovery of TOF ratio was 182.6 ± 88.9, 371.1 ± 210.4, 204.3 ± 103.2, 953.2 ± 379.7 sec in group S2, S1, SN and N, respectively. Group SN showed a significantly shorter recovery time than did group S1 and N (P < 0.001). However, statistically significant differences between the S2 and SN groups were not be observed (P = 0.291). No hyper-sensitivity reactions occurred in all groups. Conclusions: For the reversal from rocuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular blockade, the combined use of su-gammadex and neostigmine may be helpful to decrease the recovery time and can also reduce the required dosage of sugammadex. However, the increased incidence of systemic muscarinic side effects must be considered.

Details

ISSN :
20057563 and 20056419
Volume :
68
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....62b54c7d8132a01d8ba1997f743fd897