Back to Search
Start Over
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy
- Source :
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 16:1820-1828.e4
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Background & Aims Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) evaluation vary with technique, needles, and methods of specimen evaluation. We performed a direct comparison of diagnostic yields of EUS-FNA samples collected using different gauge needles (22- vs 25-gauge), with or without suction. Methods We performed a randomized controlled study of 352 patients with suspected pancreatic masses, referred for EUS-FNA at a tertiary referral center. Patients were randomly assigned to 22-gauge needles with or without suction or 25-gauge needles with or without suction. Specimens were evaluated offsite by cell block and rapid onsite cytologic evaluation (ROSE). Final diagnoses were made based on histologic analyses or 12-month follow-up evaluations. The primary outcome was diagnostic adequacy of cell blocks. Secondary outcomes were operating characteristics of ROSE and EUS-FNA, number of passes required for accurate onsite diagnosis, and amount of blood in specimens. Results The final diagnoses were malignancy (81.5% of patients) and benign disease (17.0% of patients); 1.4% of patients were lost during follow up. Cell block, ROSE, and EUS-FNA led to diagnostic accuracies of 71.9%, 95.5%, and 96.6%, respectively. A 22-gauge needle with suction was associated with more passes for adequate onsite diagnosis (P = .003) and specimens contained more blood (P = .01). Diagnostic accuracy of specimens collected by transduodenal EUS-FNA was lower with 22-gauge needles with suction compared to other techniques (P = .004). Conclusion In a randomized trial of patients undergoing EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses, samples collected with 22-gauge vs 25-gauge needles performed equally well for offsite specimen evaluation. Use of suction appears to increase number of passes needed and specimen bloodiness. Specimen collection techniques should be individualized based on method of evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02424838 .
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Suction (medicine)
Endoscopic ultrasound
Diagnostic accuracy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling
law.invention
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
medicine
Humans
Medical diagnosis
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Hepatology
medicine.diagnostic_test
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
business.industry
Gastroenterology
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Fine-needle aspiration
Specimen collection
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Referral center
Female
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
business
Nuclear medicine
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15423565
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6293d92e82b4998b94210d392624a6cb
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.004