Back to Search
Start Over
Response-Ivory crisis
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018.
-
Abstract
- Sekar et al. argue that there is unequivocal evidence that ivory trade bans are necessary for conserving elephants, and that a growing consensus removes the need to consider or incorporate alternative values in this debate. In doing so, they overlook relevant literature [e.g., (1–3)] and do not account for marginalized voices from key range states (4). Their response illustrates why the current impasse is unlikely to be resolved without a new structured process, underpinned by recognition that interpretation of scientific information on both sides of any contentious debate is influenced by values (5, 6).
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....61d04dcc26545af4f9ce9afb8109ff51
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.26018