Back to Search Start Over

Comparison Between Perfusion- and Collateral-Based Triage for Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Late Time Window

Authors :
Jae Hyoung Kim
Kyunghwa Han
Cheolkyu Jung
Jun Hwee Kim
Hyo Suk Nam
Byungjun Kim
Young Dae Kim
Dong Joon Kim
Beom Joon Kim
Ji Hoe Heo
Byung Moon Kim
Source :
Stroke. 50(12)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Perfusion-based triage has proven to be effective and safe for selecting patients who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in a late time window. We investigated collateral-based triage for EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours, in terms of interrater reliability and efficacy in predicting clinical outcome, in comparison to perfusion-based triage. Methods— One hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion for anterior circulation large artery occlusion 6 to 24 hours after last seen well were enrolled. Patients were classified into EVT-eligible and EVT-ineligible groups according to perfusion- and collateral-based triages. We evaluated the interrater reliability of collateral-based triage and differences in good outcome rates of patients who received EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages. Results— Both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion were assessable in 93 patients. Seventy-six patients were eligible for EVT according to perfusion-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 58, of whom 32 (55.1%) had good outcome. Sixty-nine patients were eligible for EVT based on collateral-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 50 patients, of whom 31 (62.0%) had good outcome. Interrater reliability of collateral-based triage was good (generalized κ=0.73 [95% CI, 0.59–0.84]). Agreement on EVT eligibility between perfusion- and collateral-based triages was moderate (κ=0.41 [95% CI, 0.16–0.61]). There was no difference in good outcome rates of patients who underwent EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages (55.1% versus 62.0%; P =0.0675). Conclusions— Collateral-based triage showed good interrater reliability and comparable efficacy to that of perfusion-based triage in predicting clinical outcome after EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours. Collateral-based triage is a reliable approach for selecting patients for EVT in the extended therapeutic time window.

Details

ISSN :
15244628
Volume :
50
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Stroke
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....61734f374b3c520f8c83639f1e1eb783