Cite
Modified reverse-puncture anastomotic technique vs. traditional technique for total minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy
MLA
Po Yang, et al. “Modified Reverse-Puncture Anastomotic Technique vs. Traditional Technique for Total Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 18, Dec. 2020. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02093-2.
APA
Po Yang, Jiawei Zhao, Xiaokang Shen, Xiaoming Shi, Shilin Chen, Peng Lu, Ming Zheng, Tianming Chen, Zhang Yan Zhou, & Hai Tao Qiu. (2020). Modified reverse-puncture anastomotic technique vs. traditional technique for total minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02093-2
Chicago
Po Yang, Jiawei Zhao, Xiaokang Shen, Xiaoming Shi, Shilin Chen, Peng Lu, Ming Zheng, Tianming Chen, Zhang Yan Zhou, and Hai Tao Qiu. 2020. “Modified Reverse-Puncture Anastomotic Technique vs. Traditional Technique for Total Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.” World Journal of Surgical Oncology 18 (December). doi:10.1186/s12957-020-02093-2.