Back to Search Start Over

Valuing the Recovery Priorities of Orthopaedic Trauma Patients After Injury: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment Within 6 Weeks of Injury

Authors :
Joseph F. Levy
K. J. Joseph
Andrew N. Pollak
Herman Johal
Brian P. Cunningham
Gerard P. Slobogean
Alexandra Mulliken
Stephan Olaya
Nathan N O'Hara
Niek S. Klazinga
APH - Quality of Care
Graduate School
APH - Aging & Later Life
Public and occupational health
Source :
Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 33, S16-S20. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives To determine the recovery priorities of extremity fracture patients during the subacute phase and the patient factors associated with variation in recovery priorities. Design Discrete choice experiment. Setting Academic trauma center. Patients One hundred ninety-eight patients with a fracture to the appendicular skeleton. Patients with severe traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and non-English-speaking patients were excluded. Main outcome measurement The relative importance of clinical recovery, work-related recovery, and obtaining disability benefits after injury. Results In the subacute period, clinical recovery was the main priority for fracture patients (mean: 62%, SD: 5.3). Work-related recovery (mean: 27%, SD: 3.9) and the receipt of other disability benefits (mean: 11%, SD: 6.4) were each of significantly less importance. Heterogeneity was observed across these estimates based on the physical demands of preinjury employment, preinjury physical health, preinjury work status, health insurance type, and the severity of the fracture. Conclusion Clinical recovery was of paramount importance for fracture patients during the subacute recovery phase. However, patients also valued resuming work and access to disability benefits. Understanding a patient's recovery priorities early in the clinical care pathway will enable the development of multidisciplinary care plans that are responsive to these priorities and, hence, deliver value-based health care. Level of evidence Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Details

ISSN :
15312291 and 08905339
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of orthopaedic trauma
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5fcb8e8b578c7e041c400433e848790a