Back to Search
Start Over
High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Source :
- BMC Medicine, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019), BMC Medicine
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) status could avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-D immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women found to be carrying an RhD-negative fetus. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-throughput NIPT for fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women not known to be sensitized to the RhD antigen, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Prospective cohort studies of high-throughput NIPT used to determine fetal RhD status were included. The eligible population were pregnant women who were RhD negative and not known to be sensitized to RhD antigen. The index test was high-throughput, NIPT cell-free fetal DNA tests of maternal plasma used to determine fetal RhD status. The reference standard considered was serologic cord blood testing at birth. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index were searched up to February 2016. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full texts identified as potentially relevant. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. The bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) models were fitted to calculate summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, false positive and false negative rates, and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 3921 references records were identified through electronic searches. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Six studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. The HSROC models demonstrated high diagnostic performance of high-throughput NIPT testing for women tested at or after 11 weeks gestation. In the primary analysis for diagnostic accuracy, women with an inconclusive test result were treated as having tested positive. The false negative rate (incorrectly classed as RhD negative) was 0.34% (95% CI 0.15 to 0.76) and the false positive rate (incorrectly classed as RhD positive) was 3.86% (95% CI 2.54 to 5.82). There was limited evidence for non-white women and multiple pregnancies. Conclusions High-throughput NIPT is sufficiently accurate to detect fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women and would considerably reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin. The applicability of these findings to non-white women and women with multiple pregnancies is uncertain. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Population
MEDLINE
lcsh:Medicine
Diagnostic accuracy
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Fetus
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Prospective Studies
education
Prospective cohort study
education.field_of_study
Rh-Hr Blood-Group System
Anti-D immunoglobulin
Obstetrics
business.industry
lcsh:R
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Prenatal Care
General Medicine
Confidence interval
Non-invasive prenatal testing
Fetal rhesus D status
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Gestation
Female
False positive rate
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Research Article
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17417015
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5fc6818180e4cedfd38e36d3bd560a4b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4