Back to Search Start Over

VLBI measurement of the vector baseline between geodetic antennas at Kokee Park Geophysical Observatory, Hawaii

Authors :
Michael Titus
Arthur Niell
Pedro Elosegui
G. Rajagopalan
Dhiman R. Mondal
Roger J. Cappallo
John E. Barrett
Chet Ruszczyk
Brian E. Corey
Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
Source :
Journal of Geodesy, Digital.CSIC: Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

22 pages, 3 figures, 8 tables, 1 appendix.-- Availability data and materials: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study were obtained either as part of the commissioning phase of the KPGO antenna in 2016 or from a VLBI observing session in 2018. These datasets are publicly available through space geodesy data servers, such as the CDDIS, and from the corresponding author on reasonable request.-- Code availability: The data were analyzed and figures were prepared using author-generated matlab™ scripts. The geodetic analysis used the publicly available program nuSolve (Bolotin et al. 2019)<br />We measured the components of the 31-m-long vector between the two very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) antennas at the Kokee Park Geophysical Observatory (KPGO), Hawaii, with approximately 1 mm precision using phase delay observables from dedicated VLBI observations in 2016 and 2018. The two KPGO antennas are the 20 m legacy VLBI antenna and the 12 m VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) antenna. Independent estimates of the vector between the two antennas were obtained by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) using standard optical surveys in 2015 and 2018. The uncertainties of the latter survey were 0.3 and 0.7 mm in the horizontal and vertical components of the baseline, respectively. We applied corrections to the measured positions for the varying thermal deformation of the antennas on the different days of the VLBI and survey measurements, which can amount to 1 mm, bringing all results to a common reference temperature. The difference between the VLBI and survey results are 0.2 ± 0.4 mm, −1.3 ± 0.4 mm, and 0.8 ± 0.8 mm in the East, North, and Up topocentric components, respectively. We also estimate that the Up component of the baseline may suffer from systematic errors due to gravitational deformation and uncalibrated instrumental delay variations at the 20 m antenna that may reach ± 10 and −2 mm, respectively, resulting in an accuracy uncertainty on the order of 10 mm for the relative heights of the antennas. Furthermore, possible tilting of the 12 m antenna increases the uncertainties in the differences in the horizontal components to 1.0 mm. These results bring into focus the importance of (1) correcting to a common reference temperature the measurements of the reference points of all geodetic instruments within a site, (2) obtaining measurements of the gravitational deformation of all antennas, and (3) monitoring local motions of the geodetic instruments. These results have significant implications for the accuracy of global reference frames that require accurate local ties between geodetic instruments, such as the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF)<br />With the funding support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), of the Spanish Research Agency (AEI)

Details

ISSN :
09497714
Volume :
95
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of geodesy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5fac9a7cb8fec235805bac7a97acf01d