Back to Search Start Over

The IARC Monographs: Updated procedures for modern and transparent evidence synthesis in cancer hazard identification

Authors :
Samet, Jonathan M
Chiu, Weihsueh A
Cogliano, Vincent
Jinot, Jennifer
Kriebel, David
Lunn, Ruth M
Beland, Frederick A
Bero, Lisa
Browne, Patience
Fritschi, Lin
Kanno, Jun
Lachenmeier, Dirk W
Lan, Qing
Lasfargues, Gérard
Curieux, Frank Le
Peters, Susan
Shubat, Pamela
Sone, Hideko
White, Mary C
Williamson, Jon
Yakubovskaya, Marianna
Siemiatycki, Jack
White, Paul A
Guyton, Kathryn Z
Schubauer-Berigan, Mary K
Hall, Amy L
Grosse, Yann
Bouvard, Véronique
Benbrahim-Tallaa, Lamia
Ghissassi, Fatiha El
Lauby-Secretan, Béatrice
Armstrong, Bruce
Saracci, Rodolfo
Zavadil, Jiri
Straif, Kurt
Wild, Christopher P
One Health Chemisch
One Health Chemisch
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 112(1), 30. Oxford University Press, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The Monographs produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) apply rigorous procedures for the scientific review and evaluation of carcinogenic hazards by independent experts. The Preamble to the IARC Monographs, which outlines these procedures, was updated in 2019, following recommendations of a 2018 expert advisory group. This article presents the key features of the updated Preamble, a major milestone that will enable IARC to take advantage of recent scientific and procedural advances made during the 12 years since the last Preamble amendments. The updated Preamble formalizes important developments already being pioneered in the Monographs program. These developments were taken forward in a clarified and strengthened process for identifying, reviewing, evaluating, and integrating evidence to identify causes of human cancer. The advancements adopted include the strengthening of systematic review methodologies; greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence, based on key characteristics of carcinogens; greater consideration of quality and informativeness in the critical evaluation of epidemiological studies, including their exposure assessment methods; improved harmonization of evaluation criteria for the different evidence streams; and a single-step process of integrating evidence on cancer in humans, cancer in experimental animals, and mechanisms for reaching overall evaluations. In all, the updated Preamble underpins a stronger and more transparent method for the identification of carcinogenic hazards, the essential first step in cancer prevention.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278874
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 112(1), 30. Oxford University Press, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5e87cd8719a966b6e5d93b9ec8cd9234