Back to Search Start Over

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review

Authors :
Edurne Zabaleta del Olmo
Elvira Hernández Martínez-Esparza
Angel Romero-Collado
Rosalia Santesmases-Masana
Ana-María Urpí-Fernández
[Romero-Collado A] Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. [Hernández-Martínez-Esparza E, Santesmases-Masana R] Sant Pau Nursing School University, Barcelona, Spain. [Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E] Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain. Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain. Gerència Territorial de Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain. [Urpí-Fernández AM] Gerència Territorial de Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
IDIAP Jordi Gol
Source :
Value In Health, 2022, vol. undef, núm. undef, p. undef, Articles publicats (D-I), Romero Collado, Ángel Hernández-Martínez-Esparza, Elvira Zabaleta del Olmo, Edurne Urpí Fernández, Ana-María Santesmases-Masana, Rosalía 2022 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review Value In Health undef undef undef, DUGiDocs – Universitat de Girona, instname, Scientia
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Peu diabètic; Psicometria; Qualitat de vida Diabetic foot; Psychometrics; Quality of life Pie diabético; Psicometría; Calidad de vida Objectives: This psychometric systematic review aimed to identify the most suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of quality of life (QoL) in people affected by diabetic foot. Methods: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) databases from inception to February 1, 2022. We also searched gray literature databases. Eligible studies were full-text reports developing a QoL condition-specific PROM or assessing one or more of its measurement properties in people affected by diabetic foot. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies independently using the "Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias" checklist. The measurement properties were evaluated using specific criteria. We graded the quality of the evidence using a "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" approach modified by Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments. Results: Forty-three reports (46 studies) providing information on the measurement properties of 10 different PROMs were included. We did not identify any instruments that could be recommended for use. We identified 2 PROMs that were not recommended for use and 8 that were potentially recommended but would require further investigation. Of these 8 PROMs, 4 had better evidence for content validity. Conclusions: Available PROMs to measure QoL in people affected by diabetic foot have limited evidence for their measurement properties. There is no fully suitable PROM. Pending further evidence, 4 PROMs could potentially be recommended for use.

Details

ISSN :
10983015
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Value in Health
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5df7312204160f7a41faad07e3095f43