Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of prone positioning on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Source :
- Critical Care
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- BioMed Central, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Introduction Prone positioning (PP) has been reported to improve the survival of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, it is uncertain whether the beneficial effects of PP are associated with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels and long durations of PP. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate whether the effects of PP on mortality could be affected by PEEP level and PP duration and to identify which patients might benefit the most from PP. Methods Publications describing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which investigators have compared prone and supine ventilation were retrieved by searching the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science and Elsevier Science (inception to May 2013). Two investigators independently selected RCTs and assessed their quality. The data extracted from the RCTs were combined in a cumulative meta-analysis and analyzed using methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results A total of nine RCTs with an aggregate of 2,242 patients were included. All of the studies received scores of up to three points using the methods recommended by Jadad et al. One trial did not conceal allocation. This meta-analysis revealed that, compared with supine positioning, PP decreased the 28- to 30-day mortality of ARDS patients with a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ≤100 mmHg (n = 508, risk ratio (RR) = 0.71, 95 confidence interval (CI) = 0.57 to 0.89; P = 0.003). PP was shown to reduce both 60-day mortality (n = 518, RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.99; P = 0.04) and 90-day mortality (n = 516, RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.75; P 12 h/day (n = 1,067, RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.99; P = 0.04). Conclusions PP reduced mortality among patients with severe ARDS and patients receiving relatively high PEEP levels. Moreover, long-term PP improved the survival of ARDS patients.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
ARDS
Time Factors
Cochrane Library
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Severity of Illness Index
law.invention
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Randomized controlled trial
law
Fraction of inspired oxygen
Internal medicine
Prone Position
Medicine
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
business.industry
Research
medicine.disease
Jadad scale
Prone position
Meta-analysis
Relative risk
Emergency medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1466609X and 13648535
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Critical Care
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5df0834dd82ac1214e5df254462379a3