Back to Search
Start Over
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment
- Source :
- Journal of Vascular Surgery. 70:478-484
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Objective Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has shown promising initial results compared with traditional surgery, but its efficacy remains highly debated. The aim of this monocentric, retrospective study was to investigate differences in morbidity, mortality, and reintervention rates between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and HALS, in the medium- and long-term follow-up in a highly selected population. Methods We treated 977 patients consecutively for nonurgent AAA from January 2006 to December 2013; among them, 615 (62.9%) underwent open surgery, 173 (17.7%) HALS, and 189 (19.3%) EVAR. For this study, only patients treated with HALS or EVAR were considered. A subsequent selection process was carried out to identify the patients with clinical characteristics and aneurysm morphology amenable to either of these treatments. The final study cohort included 229 patients; 92 (40.2%) underwent HALS and 137 (69.8%) received EVAR. The two populations were homogeneous for clinical and demographic characteristics. Results The mean duration of follow-up was 57 ± 28 months (50 ± 24 months in the EVAR group and 67 ± 29 months in the HALS group; range, 2-110 months). No deaths and no statistically significant differences in severe complications or reinterventions were observed over the perioperative period (30 days). Length of stay was significantly shorter after EVAR, because the need for and length of stay in the intensive care unit were decreased. Three postoperative deaths (in-hospital mortality >30 days: HALS, 2.2%; EVAR, 0.7%; P = .7268) occurred owing to respiratory failure (two patients, one in each group) and multiorgan failure secondary to a bowel ischemia (one patient in the HALS group). Other deaths in the study population were not related to the procedure. In both groups, the major causes of death were cancer (24 cases [36.9%]), cardiovascular causes unrelated to AAA (16 [24.6%]), and chronic obstructive lung disease (10 [15.4%]). In the long-term follow-up period, there was a difference in the overall survival in favor of HALS when compared with EVAR (P = .011). Conclusions This retrospective, single-center study shows that, within a population of similar clinical and anatomic characteristics, treatment of AAA with EVAR or HALS does not result in significant differences in early morbidity and mortality. EVAR presents significantly shorter hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, whereas HALS presents a lower aneurysm-related reintervention rate and lower perioperative cost. The strict patient selection in this trial, as is generally the case with AAA treatment, is likely the key to success for both of these techniques.
- Subjects :
- Male
Laparoscopic surgery
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
Cost-Benefit Analysis
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Endovascular aneurysm repair
law.invention
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
03 medical and health sciences
Postoperative Complications
0302 clinical medicine
Cost Savings
Risk Factors
law
medicine
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
education
Aged
Retrospective Studies
education.field_of_study
business.industry
Endovascular Procedures
Retrospective cohort study
Health Care Costs
Perioperative
Length of Stay
medicine.disease
Intensive care unit
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Respiratory failure
Retreatment
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 07415214
- Volume :
- 70
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5d0e4e6cd686d1035868ab815326b502