Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease

MLA

Lewis C. Lipson, et al. “Comparison between Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Determining Lesion Significance in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease.” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 7, Aug. 2006. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....5cd030b41c5853187f16e190159a7ff9&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Lewis C. Lipson, Ian J. Sarembock, Lawrence W. Gimple, Andrew H. Bishop, Denny D. Watson, Michael Ragosta, & Eric R. Powers. (2006). Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. The American Journal of Cardiology, 99(7).

Chicago

Lewis C. Lipson, Ian J. Sarembock, Lawrence W. Gimple, Andrew H. Bishop, Denny D. Watson, Michael Ragosta, and Eric R. Powers. 2006. “Comparison between Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Determining Lesion Significance in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease.” The American Journal of Cardiology 99 (7). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....5cd030b41c5853187f16e190159a7ff9&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.