Back to Search Start Over

Using mHealth to improve tuberculosis case identification and treatment initiation in South Africa: Results from a pilot study

Authors :
Gavin J. Churchyard
Marc Katzwinkel
Kerrigan McCarthy
Noriah Maraba
Larry W. Chang
Sue Candy
Christopher J. Hoffmann
Violet N. Chihota
Nazir Ahmed Ismail
Edwin Madibogo
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 7, p e0199687 (2018), PLoS ONE
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2018.

Abstract

Background Tuberculosis (TB) incidence in South Africa is among the highest globally. Initial loss to follow-up (ILFU), defined as not starting on TB treatment within 28 days of testing positive, is undermining control efforts. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and potential of a mHealth application to reduce ILFU. Methods An mHealth application was developed to capture patients TB investigation data, provide results and monitor treatment initiation. This was implemented in two primary health clinics (PHC) in inner-city Johannesburg. Feasibility was assessed by comparing documentation of personal details, specimen results for same individuals during implementation period (paper register and Mhealth application). Effectiveness was assessed by comparing proportion of patients with results within 48 hours, and proportion started on treatment within 28 days of testing TB positive during pre- implementation (paper register) and implementation (mHealth application) periods. In-depth interviews with patients and providers were conducted to assess acceptability of application. Results Pre-implementation, 457 patients were recorded in paper registers [195 (42.7%) male, median age 34 years (interquartile range IQR (28–40), 45 (10.5%) sputum Xpert positive]. During implementation, 319 patients were recorded in paper register and the mHealth application [131 (41.1%) male, median age 32 years (IQR 27–38), 33 (10.3%) sputum Xpert positive]. The proportion with complete personal details: [mHealth 95.0% versus paper register 94.0%, (p = 0.54)] and proportion with documented results: [mHealth 97.4% versus paper register 97.8%, (p = 0.79)] were not different in the two methods. The proportion of results available within 48 hours: [mHealth 96.8% versus paper register 68.6%), (p

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5c068f8a7b52f8395bc3c4086641d3d9