Evaluation of Radiation Oncologist and Trainee Opinions on Residency Expansion, Possible Actions, and Training Program Accreditation Changes in the United States

The objective of this study was to sample the opinions of radiation oncologists and trainees in the United States regarding residency expansion, what action(s) should be taken to limit residency supply, if any, and the proposed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) changes.An online survey was distributed to 1048 attending radiation oncologists by e-mail and approximately 800 residents through their program coordinators. The survey asked respondents to rank how strongly they agreed with certain statements regarding residency supply, possible solutions to address any perceived oversupply, and the proposed ACGME changes on a 1-to-10 disagreement-to-agreement scale. The 16% response rate yielded 294 responses for analysis.Of the respondents, 90 (30%) were residents, and 204 (70%) were attendings, of whom 117 (57%) were academic and 87 (43%) were nonacademic. Eighty-six percent agreed that there is a residency oversupply issue, and 91% agreed that actions should be taken to limit residency expansion. On χThe majority of respondents agree that there is a residency oversupply issue and that actions should be taken to limit residency expansion and make program requirements more stringent.