Back to Search Start Over

Statistical fragility of randomized clinical trials in shoulder arthroplasty

Authors :
Hasani W. Swindell
Lynn Ann Forrester
Charles M. Jobin
Liana J. Tedesco
William N. Levine
Kyle L. McCormick
Source :
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 30:1787-1793
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background The P value is a statistical tool used to assess the statistical significance of clinical trial outcomes in orthopedic surgery. However, the P value does not evaluate research quality or clinical significance. The Fragility Index (FI) is an alternative statistical method that can be used to assess the quality and significance of clinical research and is defined as the number of patients in a study intervention group necessary to convert an outcome from statistically significant to statistically insignificant or vice versa. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the statistical robustness of clinical trials regarding shoulder arthroplasty using the FI. The secondary goal was to identify trial characteristics associated greater statistical fragility. Methods A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The FI was calculated for all dichotomous, categorical study outcomes discussed in the identified studies. Descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate all studies and characterize associations between study variables. Results A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were identified and evaluated; these trials had a median sample size of 47 patients (mean, 54 patients; range, 26-102 patients) and a median of 7 patients (mean, 5.8 patients; range, 0-14 patients) lost to follow-up. The median FI was 6 (mean, 5; range, 1-11), a higher FI than what has been observed in other orthopedic subspecialties. However, the majority of outcomes (74.4%) had an FI that was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up, and most outcomes (89.7%) were statistically insignificant. Conclusion Randomized controlled trials in shoulder arthroplasty have comparable statistical robustness to the literature in other orthopedic surgical subspecialties. We believe that the inclusion of the FI in future comparative studies in the shoulder arthroplasty literature will allow surgeons to better assess the statistical robustness of future research.

Details

ISSN :
10582746
Volume :
30
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5bcce6a078338d0f0ca2e630213ae929
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.028