Back to Search
Start Over
Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
- Source :
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal, de Boer, M, van Middelkoop, M, Hauptmann, M, van der Bijl, N, Bosmans, J A W, Hendriks-Brouwer, N, Schop, S J, de Boer, J P, Hijmering, N J, Overbeek, L I H, Lobbes, M B I, Klazen, C A H, de Jong, D, Rakhorst, H A, van der Hulst, R R W J & van Leeuwen, F E 2020, ' Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs ', Aesthetic Surgery Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 156-164 . https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 40(2), 156-164. Oxford University Press, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 40(2), 156-164. SAGE Publications Inc.
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. Objectives This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. Methods The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. Results Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. Conclusions The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. Level of Evidence: 2
- Subjects :
- Adult
Pediatrics
medicine.medical_specialty
Radiography
Breast Implants
Population
Prevalence
Breast Neoplasms
030230 surgery
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specificity
law.invention
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Breast cancer screening
0302 clinical medicine
law
Breast Surgery
medicine
Ethnicity
Humans
education
Breast Implantation
Aged
Netherlands
RISK
education.field_of_study
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Absolute risk reduction
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Breast implant
Surgery
Original Article
Female
Implant
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
Risk assessment
Mammography
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1090820X
- Volume :
- 40
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5b6729f110e496a24aec69028a6a4422
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136