Back to Search Start Over

Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs

Authors :
Michael Hauptmann
René R. W. J. van der Hulst
Flora E. van Leeuwen
Sijmen J Schop
Jan de Boer
Hinne A Rakhorst
Jorn A W Bosmans
Nathalie J. Hijmering
Michele van Middelkoop
Noortje van der Bijl
Daphne de Jong
Lucy I. H. Overbeek
Marc B. I. Lobbes
Narda Hendriks-Brouwer
Caroline A H Klazen
Mintsje de Boer
Plastische Chirurgie (PLC)
RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy
MUMC+: MA Plastische Chirurgie (9)
RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health
Beeldvorming
MUMC+: MA Plastische Chirurgie (3)
MUMC+: MA AIOS Plastische Chirurgie (9)
Pathology
AGEM - Re-generation and cancer of the digestive system
CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
Source :
Aesthetic Surgery Journal, de Boer, M, van Middelkoop, M, Hauptmann, M, van der Bijl, N, Bosmans, J A W, Hendriks-Brouwer, N, Schop, S J, de Boer, J P, Hijmering, N J, Overbeek, L I H, Lobbes, M B I, Klazen, C A H, de Jong, D, Rakhorst, H A, van der Hulst, R R W J & van Leeuwen, F E 2020, ' Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs ', Aesthetic Surgery Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 156-164 . https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 40(2), 156-164. Oxford University Press, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 40(2), 156-164. SAGE Publications Inc.
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2020.

Abstract

Background Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. Objectives This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. Methods The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. Results Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. Conclusions The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. Level of Evidence: 2

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1090820X
Volume :
40
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5b6729f110e496a24aec69028a6a4422
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136