Back to Search
Start Over
Tools for Sustainable Fashion Design: An Analysis of Their Fitness for Purpose
- Source :
- Sustainability, Volume 11, Issue 13, Sustainability, Vol 11, Iss 13, p 3581 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2023
- Publisher :
- Ryerson University Library and Archives, 2023.
-
Abstract
- Understanding the complexity of sustainable fashion issues can be overwhelming and a barrier for fashion designers. A number of tools for sustainable fashion design have been developed to aid designers in the integration of sustainability into their design practices. We analyze these to determine their fitness for purpose. Among them, three categories (archetypes) of tools are identified: Universal, Participatory, and Assessment. We propose an innovation framework and a five-dimensional model of sustainability specific to fashion to facilitate the analysis of the tools. Using the archetype categorization may facilitate designers in identifying the most appropriate type of tool for a specific circumstance, depending on context and need.
- Subjects :
- Knowledge management
Fashion design
Computer science
sustainable fashion
Geography, Planning and Development
lcsh:TJ807-830
lcsh:Renewable energy sources
Context (language use)
010501 environmental sciences
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
design practice
01 natural sciences
0502 economics and business
Sustainable design
lcsh:Environmental sciences
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
lcsh:GE1-350
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
business.industry
Fitness for purpose
lcsh:Environmental effects of industries and plants
05 social sciences
fashion design
Citizen journalism
sustainable design
sustainability
lcsh:TD194-195
Categorization
Sustainability
design tools
business
050203 business & management
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Sustainability, Volume 11, Issue 13, Sustainability, Vol 11, Iss 13, p 3581 (2019)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5b3a3fd5ad2cd65d4fb8f3cece313cf0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.32920/22096304