Back to Search Start Over

FDA Approval: Alectinib for the Treatment of Metastatic, ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Crizotinib

Authors :
Amy E. McKee
Gina Davis
Kimberly Ringgold
Hong Zhao
Olen Stephens
Erin Larkins
Jingyu Yu
Whitney Helms
Huanyu Chen
Richard Pazdur
Kun He
Eias Zahalka
Gideon M. Blumenthal
Gerlie Gieser
Rajiv Agarwal
Patricia Keegan
Stacy Shifflett Shord
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 22(21)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

On December 11, 2015, the FDA granted accelerated approval to alectinib (Alecensa; Genentech) for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK)-positive, metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. This approval was based on two single-arm trials including 225 patients treated with alectinib 600 mg orally twice daily. The objective response rates (ORR) by an independent review committee in these studies were 38% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28–49] and 44% (95% CI, 36–53); the median durations of response (DOR) were 7.5 months and 11.2 months. In a pooled analysis of 51 patients with measurable disease in the central nervous system (CNS) at baseline, the CNS ORR was 61% (95% CI, 46–74); the CNS DOR was 9.1 months. The primary safety analysis population included 253 patients. The most common adverse reactions were fatigue (41%), constipation (34%), edema (30%), and myalgia (29%). The most common laboratory abnormalities were anemia (56%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (51%), increased alkaline phosphatase (47%), increased creatine phosphokinase (43%), hyperbilirubinemia (39%), hyperglycemia (36%), increased alanine aminotransferase (34%), and hypocalcemia (32%). Dose reductions due to adverse reactions occurred in 12% of patients, whereas 27% of patients had alectinib dosing interrupted for adverse reactions. Permanent discontinuation of alectinib due to adverse reactions occurred in only 6% of patients. With the clinically meaningful ORR and DOR as well as the safety profile observed in these trials, alectinib was determined to have a favorable benefit–risk profile for the treatment of the indicated population. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5171–6. ©2016 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
15573265
Volume :
22
Issue :
21
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5a9727fcf3b427ce893758f7c63dd0e8