Back to Search Start Over

Impact of feedback request forms and verbal feedback on higher education students' feedback perception, self-efficacy, and motivation

Authors :
Agricola, Bas T.
Prins, Frans J.
Sluijsmans, Dominique M.A.
Afd Educatie
Leerstoel van Tartwijk
Education and Learning: Development in Interaction
RS: SHE - R1 - Research (OvO)
Lectoraat Kansrijke Schoolloopbanen in een Diverse Stad
Kenniscentrum Onderwijs en Opvoeding
Afd Educatie
Leerstoel van Tartwijk
Education and Learning: Development in Interaction
Source :
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(1), 6. Routledge, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(1), 6-25. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 27(1), 6-25. Taylor and Francis
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

In higher education, students often misunderstand teachers' written feedback. This is worrisome, since written feedback is the main form of feedback in higher education. Organising feedback conversations, in which feedback request forms and verbal feedback are used, is a promising intervention to prevent misunderstanding of written feedback. In this study a 2 x 2 factorial experiment (N = 128) was conducted to examine the effects of a feedback request form (with vs. without) and feedback mode (written vs. verbal feedback). Results showed that verbal feedback had a significantly higher impact on students' feedback perception than written feedback; it did not improve students' self-efficacy, or motivation. Feedback request forms did not improve students' perceptions, self-efficacy, or motivation. Based on these results, we can conclude that students have positive feedback perceptions when teachers communicate their feedback verbally and more research is needed to investigate the use of feedback request forms.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0969594X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5a60acfb75b1eab4943f085d50c7730c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764